2005-09-15; 13:56:56 EDT
Member Since
2002-09-17
Posts: 4946
The state of Wisconsin has had some experience with moving towns that were located in flood prone zones. The southwestern part of the state is very hilly and is prone to flash floods, some of epic proportions. After rebuilding several cities time after time, they finally figured out that the three cities couldn't stay were they were. It took a lot of time and persuasion, but the cities relocated and are thriving today due to both state and federal aid. The point is that they are no longer flooding. Cities can be moved and people's attitude's changed. How many more people need die simply to keep a city where it shouldn't be. Perhaps we should look to correct a problem that was created a long time ago by.......of course, the French. My vote goes with relocating the city. Rummy said that.See the original archive post