R22 Discussion Group

Herb,

Herb,
As always this time of year I don't have enough time to debate this point  
for point, but as Brad often does, I offer this somewhat lengthy article for you 
 to read.

_http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/12/bush200712_ 
(http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/12/bush200712) 

Rummy

In a message dated 2/12/2008 12:48:58 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
hparsons at parsonsys.com writes:

Sorry  Rummy, but to blame "the economy" as "damage done by the current 
occument"  is neither honest, and is certainly not a "concrete fact". The 
"occupant"  doesn't prepare the budget. He may approve it, and probably 
should have  junked a lot of what was in there, but it was a joint effort 
(for what  it's worth, I don't like his ecnomics myself).

You can't ride Brad's  back on the "foreign policy" "damage", he didn't 
list any. The notion that  a few third world countries "don't like us" 
isn't foreign policy "damage",  at least not in MY view. On the other 
hand, years of ignoring treaty  violations, THAT's a foreign policy 
nightmare. It's ironic that the left  seems to decry a President doing 
exactly what he said he was going to do  as a "foreign policy nightmare". 
Guess that's what foreign policy has  become, expectations of ignored 
warnings.

But I'm beginning to  ramble. The request was for concrete facts about 
the "damage" done by the  "current occupant". You've not provided any.

R22RumRunner at aol.com  wrote:

The Rhodes 22 Discussion Group

R22RumRunner at aol.com

Politics