Herb,
Where does Nader stand on this issue?
 
Rummy
 
 
In a message dated 3/4/2008 2:30:19 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
hparsons at parsonsys.com writes:

I can't  say that I agree Robert. I'm on this list, and I don't want them 
home  "ASAP". That's the problem, when we start using all encompassing 
phrases  like "as soon as POSSIBLE".

It's "possible" for us to surrender our  mission, and bring them home. 
That's the way we can do it "soonest". There  are two candidates that are 
advocating exactly that.

One of those  candidates voted to allow the mission. Now, in order to get 
elected, she's  promising to abandon that mission, Shame on her.

Another candidate says  that we should never have engaged in that 
mission, that we cannot  accomplish the mission, and that's why he's 
abandoning it. Shame on him  too.

Another candidate says that no matter the reason we took up the  mission, 
we must finish it by winning.

Guess who's going to get my  vote?

Robert Skinner wrote:

> Ed, you are preaching to the  choir.
>
> I doubt that there is anyone on this list 
> who  wishes anything but the best for our 
> women and men in uniform, or who  would not 
> want them home ASAP.  This is not  Berkley.
>
> Our support for the humans does not waver.   
> Viet nam taught us to separate the messenger 
> from the  message.  Many of us do have some 
> issues with the  message.
>
> As to bringing our troops home, the 
>  discussion is only about timing and method.
> The guys in country only  know, "With your 
> shield or on it."
>
> Semper Fi,
>  /Robert
> --------------------------------------------
> Tootle  wrote:
>   

-- 
Herb Parsons
S/V O'Jure - O'Day  25
S/V Reve de Pappa - Coronado  35


__________________________________________________
Use  Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?  www.rhodes22.org/list





**************It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money & 
Finance.      (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001)