R22 Discussion Group

Ed,
Try rereading the thesis again and wherever the word black shows up,  replace 
it with white. Now you have a racist paper. Apparently blacks can't be  
racist?

Rummy

In a message dated 5/20/2008 12:12:53 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
ekroposki at charter.net writes:

Brad:

I have reviewed the thesis.  While I did not read  every word, the paper
seems to be a typical research paper of the  time.  I cannot find the radical
opinions that you suggest lie  therein.  There are some 'Black' advocacy
references, considering the  author, her concerns and interest; I do not find
the paper overtly  evil.

My opinion would be that it is a very narrow research  viewpoint which for a
reseach paper, it has to be.  

I would  conclude that Princeton does not nor did not expand a person’s
horizons,  considering it’s reputation.  If they could not get an  intelligent
young student to think in greater concepts, they failed.   However, such a
narrow viewpoint is being taught today in the social  sciences and especially
in sociology.  

It is the basis for  much acceptance of feel good socialism.  We have many
even on this  forum who consider that they can give their ethereal dreams to
all without  considering others’ property rights nor the unintended
consequences of  their acts. 

Ed K
Greenville, SC, USA
Addendum:  "The moment  the idea is admitted into society that property is
not as sacred as the  laws of God, and there is not a force of law and public
justice to protect  it, anarchy and tyranny commence. Property must be sacred
or liberty cannot  exist." - John Adams

Brad Haslett-2 wrote:

The Rhodes 22 Discussion Group

R22RumRunner at aol.com

for Brad - Follow up on thesis- Political - big Al delete