2008-08-26; 09:48:42 EDT
Member Since
2002-09-17
Posts: 4946
Ed, Are you forgetting to take your meds again? Rummy In a message dated 8/26/2008 8:26:36 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, ekroposki at charter.net writes: Eric: Robert Skinner wrote you to exclude political comments other than those of progressives. It is important to understand why there are those who want you to disregard creeping socialism. It is like putting a frog in cold water and slowly turning up the heat. It is too late before the frog realizes the water has boiled. It is important to always know where the writer or speaker is coming from. For example in discussions on this forum the writer of that comment said of Eliot Spitzer's philandering that private acts should be excluded from public retribution. However is has been demonstrated that, "It is a private act with public consequences." Jim DeMint and David Woodard. Why is this discussion very important today? It is important because Obama is the Democrat candidate for President of USA. It is very important to evaluate not how Obama appears and is portrayed by the media but what he factually stands for. Obama's political ideology is found in his words and his mentors. Obama states that he is a 'Progressive' and stands for change. A current analysis of the word 'Progressive' shows that it’s current meaning to be analogous to Marxism. The same system of political economy that gave us Lenin, Hitler, Castro, etc. It means government control of the political economy. In Chicago, there was in the 1900's a man named W.E.B. Dubose. He was a black man that espoused Marxism and was an acknowledged Communist. In fact, he renounced his U. S. Citizenship and moved to the Soviet Union. W.E.B. Dubose had followers and acolytes in the Chicago area. One of those incorporated Dubose thinking into religion. That was the Rev. James Cone. Rev. Cone’s writings on theology were incorporated into Obama’s former church by Rev. Wright. If Obama did not believe this Marxist theology, why did he stay a member of that church for over twenty years? The fact that he believed that Marxist theology is demonstrated in the words that Obama uses. While his current speech writers work hard to hide that by toning down his language, an understanding of his past words and beliefs shows that he still believes in Marxism. Why is this important? Tocqueville observed that “America arrived at a state of democracy without having to endure a democratic revolution… They are born equal without having to become equal.” American democracy was based on property rights and capitalism. Progressives slowly snip away property rights and its associated obligations toward the government performing their favorite charities. The freedoms we Americans have are based on the economic system of democratic capitalism, not Marxism. ? An understanding of Marxism leads one to understand the statement that new terminology means the same old concepts. To say that one is a ‘Flexible Thinker, Economic Conservative’ cannot be accurate. If one accepts ‘Progressive’ thinking, then ones economics are ‘Socialist’. It is important to distinguish the democratic capitalist system from Progressivism, Socialism, Marxism because those latter systems have demonstrated economic failure and tyranny. I ask all Americans to choose freedom. Respectfully submitted: Ed K Robert Skinner wrote:See the original archive post