The Rhodes 22 Discussion Group
Back to Member
Go to Thread
R22RumRunner at aol.com
Brad, now my turn:
2008-09-11; 09:17:51 EDT
Member Since
2002-09-17
Posts: 4946
Stan, In case your eyeglasses are a little foggy this morning, she has cute perky breasts. Rummy In a message dated 9/11/2008 9:01:50 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, stan at rhodes22.com writes: Brad, now my turn: tell me how she differs from George. something? - anything? ss ----- Original Message ----- From: "stan" <stan at rhodes22.com> To: "The Rhodes 22 Email List" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 4:34 PM Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Praise Jesus, the "evolutionists" are going to save us from the RepublicansSee the original archive post
> something? - anything? > > He won his BW. > > ss > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Herb Parsons" <hparsons at parsonsys.com> > To: "The Rhodes 22 Email List" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org> > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 3:29 PM > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Praise Jesus, the "evolutionists" are going > to save us from the Republicans > > >> Brad my friend, you're missing the obvious. As Slim so masterfully , the >> "I won't vote for a religious kook" (or actually, insert any label you >> choose there) REALLY means they're looking for an excuse not to vote for >> the person, and the "label" doesn't apply if the "labled" is from the >> left. >> >> Brad Haslett wrote: >>> Stan, >>> >>> In the jargon of fighter pilots, "this is a target rich environment". >>> So I pick you as the target among the many threads to begin the fight. >>> Who is the most devoutly religious person currently elected to >>> office? I don't know either but I'm guessing Senator Lieberman. When >>> he was the VP candidate with Gore in 2000 did we hear the constant >>> refrain of: "If Gore takes the Whitehouse, and he gets stomped by a >>> big 'carbon footprint', Uncle Joe will outlaw BBQ pork sandwiches for >>> life!" No, no one gave a shit. The current conversation is much to >>> do about nothing. Let's get back to "what exactly did Obama ever do >>> at any point in his life but complain about his or someone else's >>> treatment?" Short of running for something, what has he accomplished? >>> Something, anything! >>> >>> Brad >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:26 AM, stan <stan at rhodes22.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Slim, >>>> >>>> As a member of your religious faith, and an ardent fan, if you really >>>> plan >>>> to skip voting (in effect voting for those whose direct religious >>>> instructions got us into such a waste of our wealth and blood) I would >>>> be >>>> truly saddened. I don't think poorly of John's and Palin's inability >>>> to >>>> live up to their own family values, relying on their gods to forgive >>>> them - >>>> I worry about their health; a topic that seems to be forbidden to >>>> address. >>>> John's cheek is not like that from his prisoner days and his vp could >>>> be our >>>> leader without notice. Then where would this country's founding desire >>>> for >>>> religious freedom end up? The first example is already on the table >>>> and >>>> Catholic Joe has it right: When life starts is a religious opinion and >>>> should not be one decided by government. You may feel life does not >>>> start >>>> until a breath is taken, the Jews count a number of months before the >>>> start, >>>> the Christens count from the moment the cells begin dividing. >>>> Personally I >>>> don't think it starts until after college. If we allow a Palin to call >>>> such >>>> shots we are on a path Jefferson and all those other smart guys >>>> insisted on >>>> avoiding. McCain told the TV interviewer that if he had his way the >>>> first >>>> judge he would get rid of is Ginsberg and than went down the list of >>>> her >>>> kind. Once this is allowed to start (we already have allowed god onto >>>> our >>>> coins), god (hypocritically speaking) help us - or we will all, >>>> eventually, >>>> become strong advocates of the second amendment. >>>> >>>> John, at least is a flip flopper so, if elected, would probably revert >>>> to >>>> many of his reasonable positions. It is Palin I am fearful will give >>>> us >>>> even worse than another 8 years. (And this from a confessed >>>> womanizer.) >>>> >>>> stan/ec >>>> . >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "Steven Alm" <stevenalm at gmail.com> >>>> To: "The Rhodes 22 Email List" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 2:02 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Praise Jesus,the "evolutionists" are going >>>> to >>>> save us from the Republicans >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Todd, >>>>> >>>>> I'm an atheist and I think Palin's a religious kook. And you're >>>>> right, I >>>>> won't vote for a religious kook. I haven't studied Darwin very much >>>>> (and >>>>> I >>>>> applaud your research and quotes) but I don't think that's the only >>>>> rebuke >>>>> to creationism. Since most of the species of plant and animal life on >>>>> this >>>>> earth are in fact extinct, I'd call that "unintelligent design." >>>>> >>>>> You said there are only two possibilities as to how life started. Are >>>>> you >>>>> sure? How do you know this? What I know is that all religions serve >>>>> in >>>>> answering three questions: Where did we come from, how do we live and >>>>> what >>>>> happens when we die? Myself, I've answered those questions to my own >>>>> satisfaction and I don't need the church to tell me anything. >>>>> >>>>> Slim >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Todd Tavares <sprocket80 at mail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Slim, Wow! are you are going to vote for Obama because he is a >>>>>> Marxist >>>>>> or not vote for McCain just because Palin is a religious extremist? >>>>>> :^D >>>>>> Glad you mentioned carbon dating. Carbon has been proven by many >>>>>> scientists to be a wholly inaccurate method of dating. I am far from >>>>>> being a scientist...or a religious kook thinking the earth is only a >>>>>> couple of thousand of years old, but there is just as much scientific >>>>>> information out there to; while not proving creation is the truth, >>>>>> surely >>>>>> proves evolution is improbable if not impossible. You are/were an >>>>>> educator and were taught evolution from a text book, like we all >>>>>> were. >>>>>> Just because you read something in a text book does not make it >>>>>> truth. >>>>>> http://www.darwins-theory-of-evolution.com/ Maybe we could all >>>>>> stomach >>>>>> creationism if we called it a theory too. After all that is what >>>>>> evolution is...just an unproven theory. There are equally as many >>>>>> scientists out there who believe they have proven evolution is myth. >>>>>> It >>>>>> was not Darwin's brainstorm anyway. He thought he could further >>>>>> explain >>>>>> a centuries old belief; that life arose from non life and everything >>>>>> sprang from a common ancestor. Modern scientists say it was that >>>>>> first >>>>>> amino acid or protein chain in the pool of "primordial ooze." I like >>>>>> how >>>>>> one Nobel prize winner (Biology 1967?) put it: >>>>>> >>>>>> "There are only two possibilities as to how life arose; one is >>>>>> spontaneous generation arising to evolution, the other is a >>>>>> supernatural >>>>>> creative act of God, there is no third possibility. Spontaneous >>>>>> generation that life arose from non-living matter was scientifically >>>>>> disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others. That leaves us >>>>>> with >>>>>> only one possible conclusion, that life arose as a creative act of >>>>>> God. I >>>>>> will not accept that philosophically because I do not want to believe >>>>>> in >>>>>> God, therefore I choose to believe in that which I know is >>>>>> scientifically >>>>>> impossible, spontaneous generation arising to evolution." >>>>>> >>>>>> (Dr. George Wald, evolutionist, Professor Emeritus of Biology at the >>>>>> University at Harvard, Nobel Prize winner in Biology.) >>>>>> >>>>>> But the most interesting fact is that even Darwin himself realized >>>>>> evolution was not workable. >>>>>> >>>>>> "To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for >>>>>> adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different >>>>>> amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic >>>>>> aberration, could have formed by natural selection, seems, I freely >>>>>> confess, absurd in the highest degree possible." (Charles Darwin, >>>>>> "The >>>>>> origin of species by means of natural selection") >>>>>> >>>>>> "If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which >>>>>> could >>>>>> not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight >>>>>> modifications, my theory would absolutely break down." (Charles >>>>>> Darwin, >>>>>> "The Origin of Species") >>>>>> >>>>>> "Often a cold shudder has run through me, and I have asked myself >>>>>> whether >>>>>> I may have not devoted myself to a fantasy." (Charles Darwin, Life >>>>>> and >>>>>> Letters, 1887, Vol. 2, p. 229) >>>>>> >>>>>> I could post a few hundred quotes from noted doctors and scientists >>>>>> to >>>>>> try to "prove" evolution wrong or creation right. I could "do my >>>>>> homework" as we say here on the list and cite actual findings, but >>>>>> that >>>>>> is not necessary. Because to dismiss the possibility of God or some >>>>>> other >>>>>> Intelligent Designer makes it easier to accept our notions that it is >>>>>> ok >>>>>> to be a homosexual (and not allow me a choice when the schools teach >>>>>> this >>>>>> gargage to my kids while denying the right to learn about the theory >>>>>> of >>>>>> creation along with evolution) or that it should be a crime to kill a >>>>>> tree, but ok to kill an unborn baby. Not to say everyone believing in >>>>>> evolution is an athiest (or a Democrat), but you have made me see >>>>>> this as >>>>>> a hinge factor in how I will vote....real issues aside. >>>>>> >>>>>> Todd T >>>>>> >>>>>> Besides, it is not very PC to say we evolved (were "selected") from >>>>>> apes. >>>>>> We don't want any of the apes that were not selected to be made to >>>>>> feel >>>>>> inferior. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>> From: "Steven Alm" >>>>>> To: "The Rhodes 22 Email List" >>>>>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Praise Jesus, the Republicans are going >>>>>> to >>>>>> save us from the Republicans >>>>>> Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:11:17 -0500 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Ahh, so the "tolerant" lefty has a litmus test for religious >>>>>> beliefs." >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, I require that the candidates be sane, critical thinkers. Palin >>>>>> is >>>>>> obviously not. I wouldn't say that if she were a Catholic or a >>>>>> Lutheran >>>>>> but >>>>>> here's a woman who wants to stare down the whole scientific community >>>>>> and >>>>>> deny things like carbon 14 dating and declare that the heavens and >>>>>> earth >>>>>> are >>>>>> only a few thousand years old. You didn't just call ME an extremist, >>>>>> did >>>>>> you? >>>>>> >>>>>> Brad, you left out the part of Kroon saying that his parishioners >>>>>> should >>>>>> pray for the completion of the pipeline because at the end of the >>>>>> world, >>>>>> folks will flock to Alaska as their final refuge. >>>>>> >>>>>> I can't believe that was you quoting all that God stuff. >>>>>> >>>>>> Slim >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Steven Alm wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> "She's already demonstrated that she is fully capable of separating >>>>>>> her >>>>>>> personal beliefs from her duties." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Wouldn't it be better if she didn't have to? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:18 AM, Herb Parsons wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ahh, so the "tolerant" lefty has a litmus test for religious >>>>>>>> beliefs. >>>>>>>> She's already demonstrated that she is fully capable of separating >>>>>>>> her >>>>>>>> personal beliefs from her duties. She vetoed a bill that would have >>>>>>>> denied benefits to gay couples. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But, you extremists keep it up, I'm sure you'll find (or make up) >>>>>>>> SOMETHING on her. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Steven Alm wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> She's a creationist. Her Assembly of God stuff is a deal breaker >>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> me. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Religious extremism cannot be tolerated. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The most important legacy the president leaves is the appointment >>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> the >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> supreme court. >>>>>>>>> The next pres might appoint as many as three. If Sarabaracuda has >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> her >>>>>> >>>>>>>> way, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> say goodbye to Roe V. Wade and hello to back-ally coat hanger >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> abortions. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Slim >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Herb Parsons >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I think it's funny that the candidate that was considered as a >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> running >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> mate for the Democratic choice a few years back, is now being >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> touted as >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "more of the same". Keep trying though, you guys may find >>>>>>>>>> something >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> works. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What exactly makes Palin a "religious kook", that fact that's she >>>>>>>>>> religious? I think your colors are beginning to show. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> petelargo wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ben, thanks for your post. As you may have noticed, there is no >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> dialogue >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> the right-wing extremists. You are wrong, end of discussion and >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> your >>>>>> >>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> idiot to boot. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> When John McCain won the nomination, Bush disappears overseas. >>>>>>>>>>> At >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> the >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> RNC, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> no Bush, no Cheney (and no mention of them). They know it's a >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> failed >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> administration. Where were the solutions. Once again, they are >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> trying >>>>>> >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> frame the campaign as an ideology argument rather than an issues >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> discussion. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Today on Face the Nation, "Sis Cum Ba and WHA-LAA", McCain is >>>>>>>>>>> now >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> the >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> change >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> candidate and stated that he will end the incredible corruption >>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>> Washington and the failed policies. John McCain has re-defined a >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> whole >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> level of flip-flopping on over two dozen key issues within the >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> last >>>>>> >>>>>>>> eight >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> years including his own authored bill that he was for and now >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> against. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I couldn't give a poop about the experience argument of Palin vs >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Obama. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It's >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> a waste of time. The entire Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld-Rice-Rove, etc >>>>>>>>>>> administration could be argued to be the most experienced >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> administration >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> the history of the White House. A huge amount of prior >>>>>>>>>>> "executive >>>>>>>>>>> experience". For the first time in recent politics the >>>>>>>>>>> Republicans >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> had >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> power in the white house, judicial, house and senate. How was it >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> for >>>>>> >>>>>>>> you? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It's one thing to drive a tractor trailer up our butts, but when >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> they >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> start >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> blowing on the horn while there're doing it, it's really gone >>>>>>>>>>> too >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> far. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> A big thank you for the memories: the debt, the dead, the >>>>>>>>>>> twisting >>>>>>>>>>> intelligence to "sell" us a war on a country that did not attack >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> us, >>>>>> >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> good ol boy ineffectual cronyism, and finally the shredding of >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> constitution. With Palin we now we get to have another religious >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> kook >>>>>> >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> satisfy the so-called conservative extremist religious right to >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 'bridge' >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> them into this administration and get money. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Spending 5-10 billion dollars a month on Iraq and kissing >>>>>>>>>>> chinese >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> ass >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> (borrowing the money) of the most Marxist suppressive government >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> on >>>>>> >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> planet at this time is a conservative value? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Finally, the biggest hypocrisy of all . That these extremists >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> actually >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> that they and the republicans are the vanguards of conservatism? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> The >>>>>> >>>>>>>> two >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> top key pillars of conservatism are less government and >>>>>>>>>>> government >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> intrusion >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> and fiscal responsibility. The only administration that walked >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> that >>>>>> >>>>>>>> talk >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 50 years was a Democrat that left Bush a 500 billion dollar >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> surplus. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> He >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> blew >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> threw that in one year and it was prior to 9-11. And there is no >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> greater >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> government intrusion that being told what you can or cannot do >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> with or >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> put >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> into your body. Palin wants privacy for her family decisions, >>>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> she >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> wants >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> to legislate publicly what you should do with yours. No thanks. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ben Cittadino-2 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> My Dear Culture Warriors; >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So....are we having fun yet? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> First, I'd like to thank Richard and Slim for stepping up to >>>>>>>>>>>> join >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> the >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Assault on the Citadel". >>>>>>>>>>>> The bullets don't sting as much when the adversary's fire is >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> spread >>>>>> >>>>>>>> out >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> among more than one target. >>>>>>>>>>>> In the words first uttered by Gen. "Vinegar Joe" Stillwell, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "illegitimi >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> non carborundum". >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> As for Tootle, Brad, and Herb, you guys crack me up. I posted >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> about >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Obama >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> only because I saw Tootle's post that >>>>>>>>>>>> suggested anybody supporting Obama was either a marxist, or a >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> farm >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> animal. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What did he expect when he said that? >>>>>>>>>>>> Herb, where was your outrage that Tootle would refer to some of >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> his >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> fellow >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Rhodies" in such derogatry terms? Supporting Obama or McCain >>>>>>>>>>>> may turn out to be right or wrong, but if we debate policy and >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> don't >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> engage in mere name-calling this "sailor's bar" could be an >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> interesting >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> place. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Richard's "geezer" remarks are defensible on several grounds. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> First, >>>>>> >>>>>>>> he >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> was provoked. Second, he was defending ME. >>>>>>>>>>>> Third, it was funny. Calling someone a "marxist" as Tootle did >>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> several >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> magnitudes worse than gentle kidding of the >>>>>>>>>>>> "old fart" kind. Surely you see the difference. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The positions I tried to lay out as reasons some people support >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Obama >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> intended as an outline of ideology (as Slim noted), >>>>>>>>>>>> not an argument supporting any position. For example, Herb, you >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> are >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> pro-life and will probably vote for McCain/Palin in part for >>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> reason. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I am pro-choice, pro-embryonic stem cell research and so I will >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> support >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Obama/Biden in part for that reason. It is not hyperbole to >>>>>>>>>>>> point >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> out >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> the policy differences that explain my choice. What I know for >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> sure >>>>>> >>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> that marxism and "sheepiness" have nothing to do with it. I >>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> thought >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> about all of my positions on the issues I mentioned and am >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> completely >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> prepared to explain and justify them. In Brad's oft' repeated >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> mantra >>>>>> >>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> know I have "done my homework". >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Enough for today. The games will be on soon. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ben C. , s/v Susan Kay, Highlands, NJ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing >>>>>>>>>>>> list >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> go >>>>>> >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list >>>>>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list >>>>>>>>>> go >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> to >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list >>>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list >>>>>>>>> go >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> to >>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> __________________________________________________ >>>>>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list >>>>>>>> __________________________________________________ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> __________________________________________________ >>>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go >>>>>> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list >>>>>> __________________________________________________ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Be Yourself @ mail.com! >>>>>> Choose From 200+ Email Addresses >>>>>> Get a Free Account at www.mail.com >>>>>> >>>>>> __________________________________________________ >>>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go >>>>>> to >>>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list >>>>>> __________________________________________________ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> __________________________________________________ >>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to >>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list >>>>> __________________________________________________ >>>>> >>>> __________________________________________________ >>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to >>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list >>>> __________________________________________________ >>>> >>>> >>> __________________________________________________ >>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to >>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list >>> __________________________________________________ >>> >>> >>> >> __________________________________________________ >> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to >> http://www.rhodes22.org/list >> __________________________________________________ > __________________________________________________ To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list __________________________________________________ **************Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog, plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com. (http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014)
Message to Webmaster:
To use your email application to send a messsage to the webmaster rather than this form, .
Post to the Rhodes 22 Email List:
Sending Post:
Your post is being sent... 