2008-10-30; 14:15:27 EDT
Member Since
2002-09-17
Posts: 4946
Ed, You really need to start taking your meds again. First of all, I can't believe that you have the time to write this crap. Secondly, I am trying to understand your totally convoluted brain and why it works this way. You really need to start drinking.......and never stop. It will give you a whole new perspective on life. Rummy In a message dated 10/30/2008 7:53:10 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, ekroposki at charter.net writes: Recently several snide remarks were made toward a returning Rhodie by a newbie without aforethought to whom the remarks were directed. This is consistent with contemporary liberalism. Specifically, They did no recognizable serious research into the underlying facts. Could it have been that the jokes are trying to politely tell the recipient something about himself? Could they be asking real questions as to whether these educated people are making any good contribution to real problems? I would suggest the possibility that lawsuits are just a form of coercion. Often the coercion applied is economically more deleterious than the original problem. Humans respond to leadership and rebel against coercion. Rather these folks accept a feel good answer to social problems. I would like to ask Peter if he ever sat down and listened to a survivor of the Soviet Socialist system that escaped from that system before or shortly after the collapse of the ‘Iron Curtain’. Others point to socialized medicine in Europe as a working solution. There is a reason why most of the best physicians around the world ardently seek to practice medicine in the USA. The reason is that socialized medicine does not offer the best care nor does it offer the best health care workers an environment conducive to the best medical practice. I can point to some very competent individuals who made the best of a bad situation. Specifically to some physicians and other health care workers who choose to work within the socialist system. After talking with those physicians, nurses and other health care workers all believed that socialized medicine was not the best answer. What I say, is that for the most part the supporters of nationalized health care have studied neither the facts nor the caregivers assessments. They are trying to inject a feel good opinion on others. They are trying to use the power of the state (government) to accomplish their personal opinions. They are trying to use the failed Marxist solutions in America. And, again I ask which system has a demonstrable track record of providing a higher standard of living for all? The historical answer is not socialism. I ask how long the Philadelphia lawyer would have been on a waiting list in a socialized country for elective surgery ? Or in order to be moved up the list how many payments would be needed (typical solution is graft)? Whereas, in America his doctor got him an appointment for his surgery at the hospital/clinic of his choice. Freedom is amazing and elusive and it does not come from socialism. Ed K addendum: “Barack Obama's motto "Change you can believe in" has acquired a new meaning, changing his positions is the only thing you can believe in. His campaign began with a huge change in the image he projects, compared to what he was doing for 20 years before.” Thomas Sowell (it should be noted that Sowell is a black man with a Ph.D. in economics and studied at the University of Chicago) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Snide-remarks-and-Lawyer-Jokes-%28Political%29%28not-sailing%2C-Big-Al-you-can-delete%29-tp20245371p20 245371.html Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.See the original archive post