2008-12-22; 13:12:34 EST
Member Since
2002-09-17
Posts: 4946
Ben, She should have left the bastard to burn. No nice deed ever goes unpunished. Rummy In a message dated 12/22/2008 11:36:26 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, bcittadino at dcs-law.com writes: In the Spirit of the Christmas Season (sarcastic reference) I thought I would reprint this blurb that came across my desk today. Frankly, although I practice law as a plaintiff's trial lawyer I think this is a bad decision, based upon a flawed interpretation of a statute that was passed in order to encourage people to render assistance in an emergency. I am, quite frankly, appalled that the Court would be so short-sighted as to ignore the long term public policy good intended by the statute in favor of a misguided attempt to find money to aid this one victim. To be fair, I haven't read the decision (only the blurb below), and I hope there's more to it than appears in the brief summary. It won't stop me, and I expect it won't stop most of you, from rendering aid in an emergency but the decision is a troubling one the say the least: "CALIFORNIA HIGH COURT ALLOWS SUIT AGAINST GOOD SAMARITAN The California Supreme Court ruled 4-3 last Thursday that the state's immunity from liability for emergency help doesn't apply to ordinary citizens coming to the rescue. The ruling, Van Horn v. Watson et al., allows Lisa Torti to be sued by Alexandra Van Horn, a friend whom Torti pulled from a crashed car she feared would explode, allegedly causing or worsening injuries that left Van Horn permanently paralyzed. The state law, which bars suits against anyone who "in good faith, and not for compensation, renders emergency care at the scene of an emergency," does not distinguish between types of emergency care, but the majority said the context shows it was meant to be limited to medical care." Ben C. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Hard-Cases-Make-Bad-Law--Rendering-Aid-in-an-Emergency.-tp21130736p21130736.html Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.See the original archive post