Ben,
Right. Another piece of wisdom passed down from our federal government. I
can't remember the last time I saw a 22 foot battle ship or maybe a 22 foot
aircraft carrier. Kinda reminds me of my favorite government saying: Hi,
I'm from the government and I'm here to help you. Get real man. Life lines on
a 22 foot sailboat is just plain stupid. To say nothing about their
appearance. The R22 is a good looking craft. Don't turn it into a garbage scow
with life lines. If you can't stay put on a 22 foot sailboat you deserve to
get dunked. Life lines won't fix stupid.
Rummy
In a message dated 11/4/2010 2:13:02 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
bencittadino at gmail.com writes:
Rummy & Dave;
I remember being taught in the USN to NEVER sit upon, lean against, or even
touch the life line railings aboard ship. The only time anyone should touch
them is when maintaining or repairing them. The idea is they are only there
as a last resort and if you have to grab them you shouldn't be out there to
begin with.
I would never tell anyone not to have them because if they keep you from
going overboard only once in twenty years they can be worth the money, but
remember they are not built for routine daily stress and strain, or
reliance. You can look at them, but don't touch them 'till you really need
them.
BenC
s/v susan kay ('93 recycled '08) (no railings)
R22RumRunner wrote:
>> Dave,
> Unless you have small children, I see no need for the railings. Just my
2
> cents worth. I like to keep things both simple and clean.
>> Rummy
>>> In a message dated 11/4/2010 1:01:42 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>rhodes22dave at gmail.com writes:
>> Rummy, I think the railings are okay. They make great hangers for the
> fenders at the dock. [?]
> I could do without them, but my wife likes them. They are handy to lean
> against a little, for balance, when cleaning or doing various chores
> about
> the boat.
> When under sail, actually they don't get in the way or interfere with
the
> 175. They virtually touch the outer stays, and the sail could not go in
> further anyway.
> The one inconvenience is that the genoa sheet can, in the process of
> tacking, get wedged in between the stay and the rail, requiring me to
go
> forward and free it, or to jiggle the line and try to fool with it
> remotely.
> However, I would be interested in the views of others that have rails.
I
> was planning to order them on my new R22, but I could be persuaded
either
> way, if the Commandant--my wife--could be persuaded (an unlikely event).
> Dave
>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 7:17 AM, <R22RumRunner at aol.com> wrote:
>>> Dave,
>> The fact that you have the side railings makes your boat a completely
>> different animal. I have never sailed on one with the railings, but I
>> can
>> imagine the problems you will encounter with them. You might ask for
> advice
>> from
>> someone who has the railings. Personally, I don't like them on a 22
foot
>> sailboat. In fact, I don't even like them on a larger boat, but I
>> understand
>> why they might be needed. Your inability to make the 175 work for you
>> is
>> directly related to the railings. You might want to consider replacing
>> your
>> furling drum with one that allows a complete sail change on the fly,
>> unlike
>> the GB furler.
>>>> Rummy.......still waiting for the shuttle to go up.
>>>>>> In a message dated 11/3/2010 12:55:35 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>>rhodes22dave at gmail.com writes:
>>>> Lee, thanks for your comments. I may give you a call, as I will have
> to
>> decide which sail to put on my R22 this time, as compared to the 175 I
>> have
>> been using. Last weekend the wind was mild but steady--about 5 mph.
>> Using
>> the full 175 was very pleasant. But in gusty or changeable winds (our
>> most
>> common lake condition), and where sailing close hauled is important,
>> the
>> 175
>> is simply too much sail area too far forward, and even when largely
>> furled,
>> the boat doesn't point well--worse than all the other boats that I
see.
>> Unless the genoa is furled way in, I don't see how I could lead the
> sheets
>> through the inner guides on the deck, inside the shrouds. I was
> surprised
>> that you mentioned that the smaller genoa would be closer to the
deck.
> I
>> haven't seen one, but I assumed that the 130/140/150 sizes would
simply
> be
>> made in their smaller sizes by shortening or raising the foot of the
> sail.
>>>> I also use my full 175 less than 20% of the time, and when I am on a
> reach
>> in mild weather conditions, it is a very nice sail. So if you can
keep
> a
>> decent sail shape and still furl it way in for other conditions and
>> re-route
>> the sheets to one of the inner paths, then it's probably a good
>> multi-purpose compromise for a sail. 80% of the time, I have the
>> genoa
>> furled in to greater or lesser degrees, and I am telling myself that
> next
>> time I am going to have a smaller sail.
>>>> I also have the steel side rails, which are very convenient, but the
>> sheets
>> do often catch between the rails and the stays on tacking, and I have
>> to
>> go
>> forward and free them up. This is avoided by furling in
substantially
>> just
>> before tacking, and then letting the sail back out, but a smaller sail
>> would
>> be just that much more convenient.
>>>> Dave
>>>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:33 PM, KUHN, LELAND <LKUHN at cnmc.org> wrote:
>>>> > Dave,
>> >
>> > "I have never
>> > liked the 175 genoa very much because I can't sail nearly as close
to
>> > the
>> > wind as any of hundreds of other sailboats on our lake."
>> >
>> > I don't think a smaller Genoa will help you sail closer to the wind
>> as
>> > much as re-routing your sheets. You still won't be able to pull
your
>> > jib or smaller Genoa closer to the center of your boat if your
sheets
>> > are run outside of the outer shroud.
>> >
>> > As for sail shape, you can pull a 175% Genoa just as tight as a
> smaller
>> > Genoa. A smaller Genoa won't have as much rolled-up bulk around the
>> > furler and the sail will be closer to the deck, which will probably
>> > improve performance slightly if you're on a close reach.
>> >
>> > The primary reason I would opt for a smaller Genoa is because I use
> the
>> > full 175% sail less than 20% of the time. When I do use the full
> 175% I
>> > swear I'll never go with anything smaller.
>> >
>> > Feel free to give me a call if you'd like to discuss upwind
> performance.
>> > 202.476.5369
>> >
>> > Good luck!
>> >
>> > Lee
>> > 1986 Rhodes22 AT EASE
>> > Kent Island, MD
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org>> > [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of
Rhodes22Dave
>> > Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 11:51 PM
>> > To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>> > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Sailing Upwind
>> >
>> >
>> > Interesting. I will try this. I also thought that re-routing the
> genoa
>> > sheets inside the shrouds would just get the sail caught. I have
> never
>> > liked the 175 genoa very much because I can't sail nearly as close
to
>> > the
>> > wind as any of hundreds of other sailboats on our lake. I can do a
>> > little
>> > better by furling in the genoa to a much smaller exposed sail
> area--but
>> > at a
>> > cost of sail shape with all the furling. I may get a second R22
and
> am
>> > thinking of getting a smaller genoa--or adding the self-tending
jib.
>> > But
>> > what you suggest might be a solution, at least for long tacks.
>> > Dave
>> >
>> > Ben Cittadino wrote:
>> > >
>> > > I had two days in a row on Sandy Hook Bay in NJ this weekend, and
I
>> > want
>> > > to report that I had a pleasing experience by "finally"
re-routing
> the
>> > > Jib (175 Genny) sheets inside the outer shrouds to try for better
>> > upwind
>> > > sailing. I have to say that I didn't expect much difference, but
I
> was
>> > > delighted to get inside 45 degrees at last. I obviously didn't let
>> the
>> > > Genny out to the full 175, but at 100 we flew along and I felt
like
> I
>> > > could make real headway upwind. I had delayed trying the new
route
> for
>> > > the sheets because I thought the sail would get all hung up in
the
>> > > shrouds, but it's become no big deal. Try it, you'll like it.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > BenCittadino
>> > >
>> > > S/V Susan Kay ('93 recycled '08)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > __________________________________________________
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > --
>> > View this message in context:
>> > http://old.nabble.com/Sailing-Upwind-tp29517214p30044777.html>> > Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >
>> > __________________________________________________
>> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
>> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list>> >
>> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> archives
>> > go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list>> > __________________________________________________
>> >
>> > __________________________________________________
>> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
>> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list>> >
>> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> archives
>> go
>> > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list>> > __________________________________________________
>> >
>> __________________________________________________
>> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
>>http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list>>>> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
archives
> go
>> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list>> __________________________________________________
>>>> __________________________________________________
>> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
>>http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list>>>> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
>> go
>> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list>> __________________________________________________
>>> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: image/png
> Size: 646 bytes
> Desc: not available
> Url :
>http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20101104/2d5d8591/attachment.png
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
>http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list>> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
go
> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list> __________________________________________________
>> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
>http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list>> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list> __________________________________________________
>>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Sailing-Upwind-tp29517214p30134738.html
Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__________________________________________________
To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
__________________________________________________
×
Message to Webmaster:
To use your email application to send a messsage to the webmaster rather than this form,
.
