2012-05-27; 19:46:31 EDT
Member Since
2002-09-17
Posts: 4946
David, I'm with Jerry on this one. Having the height of the mast crutch makes raising and lowering much easier. Like with everything on a R22, Stan has a reason for building it the way he does. That guy is a genius. Rummy In a message dated 5/27/2012 2:11:03 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, cjlowe at sssnet.com writes: David, I've towed with the mast setting on the stern rail several times,before I bought the mast raising system (with the included mast carrier.) The problems start when you get to the water and start to rig. I believe the system was made to work as a system. With the mast on the carrier,the angle of the mast makes the hoist work MUCH easier,as the mast is being pulled up,more than it is being pulled forward. With the mast resting on the stern rail,the forces are much different,the mast hoist has to pull the mast forward a lot harder to get it to start to raise. This puts alot more stress on everything involved,such as the forward chainplates,the forward cleat,the mast hoist and line,the "foot" that the hoist mounts to,but most worrysome,the mast step. The mast step is made to pull out if something goes really wrong.On a new boat there should be plenty of strength there.But with every year of use and/or not knowing what a PO has done in that concern,your odds of success get less and less. I know I wouldn't want to be cranking the winch,trying to get the mast off the stern rail,when the mast step let loose. One more thing,it's alot easier to handle the mast bundle with the roller on the mast carrier. The next one more thing,it's easier to get things out of the cabin with the mast more out of the way. At least ,thats the way I see it.YMMV. Jerry Lowe Country RhodesSee the original archive post